🔗 Share this article

One of some of the most recognizable pictures from the twentieth century depicts a naked girl, her hands extended, her features twisted in pain, her flesh scorched and flaking. She is running towards the photographer after fleeing a napalm attack in South Vietnam. Beside her, additional kids are racing out of the devastated village in the region, with a scene featuring dark smoke and military personnel.

The Worldwide Impact of a Powerful Photograph

Shortly after the release during the Vietnam War, this picture—formally called "The Terror of War"—turned into a traditional hit. Witnessed and debated globally, it's broadly credited with energizing global sentiment against the American involvement in Southeast Asia. One noted author subsequently remarked that the profoundly lasting picture of the child the girl suffering likely was more effective to fuel public revulsion against the war compared to lengthy broadcasts of broadcast barbarities. A legendary British documentarian who reported on the conflict labeled it the single best photo from what became known as the televised conflict. A different veteran war journalist declared how the picture is quite simply, one of the most important photographs ever made, specifically from that conflict.

A Long-Standing Claim and a New Allegation

For 53 years, the photo was attributed to Huynh Cong “Nick” Út, an emerging local photographer working for the Associated Press in Saigon. However a disputed new film released by a streaming service argues which states the iconic photograph—widely regarded to be the pinnacle of combat photography—might have been shot by someone else at the location during the attack.

According to the investigation, the iconic image may have been photographed by a freelancer, who provided his work to the AP. The assertion, and its following research, originates with a former editor an ex-staffer, who claims that a powerful editor ordered the staff to reassign the photo's byline from the original photographer to Nick Út, the one AP staff photographer present during the incident.

This Quest to find the Real Story

Robinson, advanced in years, contacted a filmmaker a few years ago, seeking help to identify the uncredited photographer. He expressed that, should he still be alive, he hoped to extend an acknowledgment. The filmmaker reflected on the unsupported photographers he had met—likening them to the stringers of today, similar to local photographers during the war, are routinely overlooked. Their efforts is commonly questioned, and they function in far tougher conditions. They have no safety net, no retirement plans, minimal assistance, they often don’t have adequate tools, and they remain extremely at risk when documenting in their own communities.

The investigator pondered: Imagine the experience for the man who captured this iconic picture, should it be true that it wasn't Nick Út?” As an image-maker, he imagined, it must be profoundly difficult. As a student of the craft, specifically the vaunted combat images of the era, it would be earth-shattering, perhaps legacy-altering. The respected legacy of the photograph among Vietnamese-Americans was so strong that the creator whose parents fled in that period felt unsure to pursue the film. He stated, I was unwilling to unsettle this long-held narrative that Nick had taken the photograph. Nor did I wish to change the existing situation among a group that had long admired this accomplishment.”

The Search Unfolds

But the two the filmmaker and the director concluded: it was necessary raising the issue. As members of the press are to hold everybody else accountable,” said one, it is essential that we be able to ask difficult questions within our profession.”

The film tracks the investigators as they pursue their research, from eyewitness interviews, to public appeals in today's Saigon, to archival research from other footage recorded at the time. Their work eventually yield a name: Nguyễn Thành Nghệ, employed by a news network at the time who also sold photographs to foreign agencies independently. In the film, a moved the man, currently in his 80s and living in the US, claims that he provided the image to the news organization for minimal payment and a print, but was plagued by not being acknowledged over many years.

The Backlash Followed by Further Investigation

He is portrayed in the footage, quiet and reflective, yet his account proved incendiary in the field of journalism. {Days before|Shortly prior to