🔗 Share this article

Around the globe, governments are investing enormous sums into the concept of “sovereign AI” – creating national artificial intelligence models. From the city-state of Singapore to Malaysia and Switzerland, countries are competing to create AI that comprehends local languages and cultural nuances.

The Worldwide AI Arms Race

This initiative is an element in a wider worldwide competition led by large firms from the United States and the People's Republic of China. Whereas organizations like OpenAI and Meta allocate massive resources, middle powers are additionally making sovereign bets in the AI field.

But amid such tremendous sums in play, is it possible for developing states secure notable gains? According to a specialist from a well-known research institute, Except if you’re a wealthy government or a big company, it’s quite a hardship to develop an LLM from nothing.”

Security Concerns

Many nations are reluctant to rely on external AI systems. Across India, for example, American-made AI systems have at times been insufficient. An illustrative example involved an AI tool used to teach learners in a distant village – it communicated in English with a pronounced American accent that was nearly-incomprehensible for regional listeners.

Furthermore there’s the national security dimension. In the Indian defence ministry, relying on certain international systems is viewed unacceptable. Per an founder explained, “It could have some unvetted learning material that may state that, oh, Ladakh is separate from India … Using that specific model in a military context is a big no-no.”

He further stated, “I have spoken to experts who are in the military. They wish to use AI, but, disregarding specific systems, they prefer not to rely on American systems because details might go outside the country, and that is completely unacceptable with them.”

Domestic Efforts

Consequently, a number of states are supporting domestic initiatives. One such effort is underway in the Indian market, where a firm is working to create a domestic LLM with government backing. This project has dedicated about 1.25 billion dollars to machine learning progress.

The expert foresees a AI that is less resource-intensive than top-tier systems from US and Chinese tech companies. He explains that the country will have to make up for the financial disparity with talent. Based in India, we do not possess the option of investing billions of dollars into it,” he says. “How do we contend against for example the $100 or $300 or $500bn that the United States is devoting? I think that is the point at which the key skills and the strategic thinking plays a role.”

Native Focus

Throughout the city-state, a public project is funding machine learning tools trained in local native tongues. Such languages – for example Malay, the Thai language, Lao, Indonesian, Khmer and others – are commonly underrepresented in Western-developed LLMs.

I hope the experts who are building these independent AI systems were aware of just how far and the speed at which the frontier is progressing.

A leader engaged in the program notes that these models are intended to enhance more extensive AI, rather than replacing them. Systems such as ChatGPT and another major AI system, he comments, commonly struggle with regional languages and culture – speaking in stilted Khmer, as an example, or proposing non-vegetarian meals to Malaysian users.

Developing regional-language LLMs allows local governments to code in local context – and at least be “knowledgeable adopters” of a sophisticated tool built in other countries.

He continues, I am prudent with the term national. I think what we’re trying to say is we aim to be more accurately reflected and we want to grasp the capabilities” of AI systems.

International Collaboration

For nations seeking to find their place in an escalating global market, there’s another possibility: join forces. Experts connected to a respected policy school put forward a state-owned AI venture distributed among a group of emerging states.

They call the initiative “an AI equivalent of Airbus”, in reference to the European effective play to build a rival to Boeing in the 1960s. Their proposal would see the creation of a public AI company that would pool the assets of several countries’ AI projects – including the UK, Spain, Canada, the Federal Republic of Germany, Japan, Singapore, the Republic of Korea, France, the Swiss Confederation and the Kingdom of Sweden – to establish a competitive rival to the US and Chinese leaders.

The main proponent of a report outlining the concept notes that the idea has drawn the attention of AI leaders of at least several countries up to now, along with a number of state AI companies. Although it is currently focused on “middle powers”, emerging economies – the nation of Mongolia and the Republic of Rwanda included – have likewise expressed interest.

He explains, Currently, I think it’s just a fact there’s less trust in the commitments of this current American government. People are asking like, can I still depend on such systems? In case they opt to