🔗 Share this article

As a Dungeon Master, I usually steered clear of heavy use of chance during my tabletop roleplaying adventures. My preference was for the plot and session development to be guided by deliberate decisions as opposed to pure luck. However, I chose to alter my method, and I'm incredibly glad I did.

The Catalyst: Observing a Custom Mechanic

A well-known streamed game utilizes a DM who frequently requests "fate rolls" from the adventurers. The process entails picking a type of die and outlining potential outcomes contingent on the number. While it's fundamentally no different from using a pre-generated chart, these get invented spontaneously when a character's decision lacks a obvious outcome.

I opted to test this method at my own game, mainly because it appeared interesting and offered a departure from my standard routine. The outcome were remarkable, prompting me to think deeply about the often-debated dynamic between planning and spontaneity in a roleplaying game.

A Memorable In-Game Example

In a recent session, my group had concluded a large-scale fight. Later, a cleric character asked about two friendly NPCs—a sibling duo—had made it. Rather than deciding myself, I handed it over to chance. I asked the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. I defined the outcomes as: a low roll, both died; a middling roll, a single one succumbed; a high roll, they both lived.

The player rolled a 4. This triggered a deeply moving scene where the characters came upon the bodies of their companions, still united in death. The party performed last rites, which was especially significant due to prior roleplaying. As a final touch, I decided that the remains were strangely restored, containing a magical Prayer Bead. I randomized, the bead's contained spell was perfectly what the party lacked to solve another critical quest obstacle. One just script such magical coincidences.

Improving Your Improvisation

This incident made me wonder if randomization and spontaneity are actually the beating heart of D&D. While you are a prep-heavy DM, your improvisation muscles may atrophy. Players often excel at upending the most detailed narratives. Therefore, a good DM has to be able to think quickly and invent details in the moment.

Employing on-the-spot randomization is a excellent way to practice these talents without venturing too far outside your usual style. The key is to use them for low-stakes situations that don't fundamentally change the overarching story. For instance, I wouldn't use it to determine if the king's advisor is a secret enemy. But, I could use it to determine if the characters arrive moments before a critical event takes place.

Empowering Player Agency

Luck rolls also works to make players feel invested and create the feeling that the adventure is dynamic, shaping based on their decisions immediately. It prevents the feeling that they are merely actors in a DM's sole story, thereby enhancing the collaborative foundation of roleplaying.

Randomization has historically been part of the game's DNA. The game's roots were enamored with encounter generators, which fit a playstyle focused on dungeon crawling. While modern D&D frequently focuses on story and character, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, it's not necessarily the required method.

Finding the Sweet Spot

Absolutely nothing wrong with thorough preparation. However, equally valid no issue with relinquishing control and letting the whim of chance to guide minor details instead of you. Authority is a significant factor in a DM's responsibilities. We need it to facilitate play, yet we can be reluctant to give some up, in situations where doing so might improve the game.

The core suggestion is this: Don't be afraid of letting go of your plan. Experiment with a little chance for inconsequential outcomes. You might just discover that the surprising result is significantly more rewarding than anything you might have planned on your own.